Power and propulsion
Combustion engine design, fuel and lubrication systems, and auxiliary power units, including development work funded through SBIR programs.
Concept, detailed design, analysis, prototype and test, with the machines to build it in the same building. Our design and engineering covers circuit card assemblies and wire harnesses as well as machined and fabricated metal parts. You get a released data package and a route into production, not a report.
Most design work fails at the handoff. A design house produces a beautiful model, a shop quotes it, and the quote comes back at three times the target because nobody asked whether it could be held.
Design, prototype manufacture and test sit under one roof here, which means the questions get asked in the right order. What it costs to make is part of the design decision, not a discovery afterwards.
Combustion engine design, fuel and lubrication systems, and auxiliary power units, including development work funded through SBIR programs.
Custom harness development for manned and unmanned ground platforms, from a single cable assembly to a fully integrated wiring system built for the space and environment available.
Ground and air platform development, where weight, power and volume are all constrained at the same time.
Complex moving assemblies where tolerance stack, thermal growth and service access all have to be resolved together.
Schematic capture and board layout, taken through to a fabricated and populated card built to IPC class.
Reviewing an existing design against what the shop floor can actually hold, before the tolerances turn into scrap.
The gap between design and manufacture is where schedules go. Closing it is the whole point.
The engineer specifying the part and the machinist cutting it are in the same building. Unbuildable geometry gets caught in the design review, not on the first article.
Multi axis machining, fabrication and assembly on site, so an iteration takes days rather than a quoting cycle at an outside shop.
Dynamometer and laboratory testing against the requirement, with the design revised on the evidence rather than on opinion.
The same people carry a program from concept through test, so nothing is lost in the handoff between a design house and a manufacturer.
What the thing has to do, in what envelope, at what weight, under what conditions. Most program risk is written in or designed out at this stage.
Modeled and drawn to a released standard, with the manufacturing method chosen alongside the geometry rather than after it.
Structural, thermal and performance analysis to find where the design fails before anything is cut.
Parts machined and fabricated in house, which keeps the iteration loop short and the cost visible.
Built up and tested against the requirement, including dynamometer and instrumented testing where the program calls for it.
A released, revision controlled data package and a route into short run or sustained production, rather than a report and a handshake.
You do not need a drawing to start. A requirement, an envelope and a target cost is enough for a first conversation with an engineer.